Debate--The United Nations: Still Relevant After All These Years?

Jun 12, 2006

00:00
00:00
00:00
00:00

Is the UN "I" for irrelevant, or "I" for indispensable, as Shashi Tharoor would have it? While conceding that the UN is relevant, Ruth Wedgwood argues that "competing multilaterals" should also play a role in solving the world's problems. This witty but deeply serious debate will give both sides of the argument food for thought.

You may also like

MAR 17, 2025 Article

An Immigration Philosophy Fit for Our Better Selves

America needs an immigration policy that can meet its duties, reflect its values, and serve its interests. How can we create this more ethical framework?

Helmet and Flack Jackets of MONUC Peacekeepers

MAR 13, 2025 Video

Moral Dilemmas and Political Tradeoffs in Peacekeeping Operations

In the first event in our Ethics Empowered: Leadership in Practice series, practitioners grapple with critical questions for UN peacekeeping, now and in the future.

Border wall between California and Mexico.

MAR 10, 2025 Article

In Search of a Migration Governance Framework for the Modern Age

The time for a crisis-driven approach to migration has passed. A pragmatic global response is needed—and MIMC is the mechanism to get us there.