The George H. W. Bush philosophy was born of something called the Powell Doctrine. Powell was the chief of the Joint Chiefs and was a national security advisor and a very bright general. Powell believed, based on the Vietnam experience, that if the United States goes to war, it has to have a clear military objective: Down the road, that's what I want to accomplish. I want to put the number of troops in that can take care of that problem, I want to have popular support, and I want to have an exit strategy. I want to go in, I want to accomplish it, and I want to get out.
That is what he said is the military's role. It's not there to build schools. It's a very important point.
George H. W. bought into that completely. That was, in a sense, the beauty of the Kuwait operation. We went in with vastly more troops than we needed, because Powell wanted to overwhelm the enemy. And he did. It was a 100-hour war. George H. W. then had before him the option of going up to Baghdad and taking care of the bad guy. People like Scowcroft said to him, "Mr. President, if you go up there, I can tell you right now, from the military point of view, we can do that. That's not hard. But once we get there, what do we do? Do we become the government? Who are the good guys we deal with? We couldn't tell you." And Bush wisely said, "We're not going."
Right now that Powell Doctrine, which you were alluding to, is something that exists in the far-out corners of the Washington strategic mind.
订阅《卡内基伦理通讯》,了解更多有关伦理和国际事务的信息
相关资源
2021 年 8 月 23 日 - 文章
从阿富汗撤军的伦理问题
2003 年 3 月 5 日 - 文字稿
伊拉克战争为什么萨达姆必须下台......为什么美国必须领导
威廉-克里斯托尔和劳伦斯-卡普兰认为,伊拉克建国努力的成功不仅将成为中东变革的催化剂,还将证明美国的利益与理想是一致的。