沃德-威尔逊反思核武器

录制于 2013 年 1 月 16 日

在 2013 年的一次活动中Carnegie Council 、 沃德-威尔逊在 2013 年的一次活动中,现任现实主义起义组织执行主任的沃德-威尔逊(Ward Wilson)说,二战结束时日本投降的原因是苏联宣战,而不是广岛核爆。一位听众随后提出,苏联是因为广岛才宣战的。

单击此处查看本讲座的完整文字记录和音频。

Nuclear weapons shocked Japan into surrendering at the end of World War II—except they didn’t. Japan surrendered because the Soviet Union entered the war. Japanese leaders said the bomb forced them to surrender because it was less embarrassing to say they had been defeated by a miracle weapon. Americans wanted to believe it, and the myth of nuclear weapons was born.

Look at the facts. The United States bombed 68 cities in the summer of 1945. If you graph the number of people killed in all 68 of those attacks, you imagine that Hiroshima is off the charts, because that’s the way it’s usually presented. In fact, Hiroshima is second. Tokyo, a conventional attack, is first in the number killed. If you graph the number of square miles destroyed, Hiroshima is sixth. If you graph the percentage of the city destroyed, Hiroshima is 17th.

Clearly, in terms of the end result—I’m not talking about the means, but in terms of the outcome of the attack—Hiroshima was not exceptional. It was not outside the parameters of attacks that had been going on all summer long. Hiroshima was not militarily decisive.

The Soviet Union’s declaration of war, on the other hand, fundamentally altered the strategic situation. Adding another great power to the war created insoluble military problems for Japan’s leaders. It might be possible to fight against one great power attacking from one direction, but anyone could see that Japan couldn’t defend against two great powers attacking from two different directions at once.

The Soviet declaration of war was decisive; Hiroshima was not.

After Hiroshima, soldiers were still dug in in the beaches. They were still ready to fight. They wanted to fight. There was one fewer city behind them, but they had been losing cities all summer long, at the rate of one every other day, on average. Hiroshima was not a decisive military event. The Soviet entry into the war was.

And they said this. Japan’s leaders identified the Soviet Union as the strategically decisive factor. In a meeting of the Supreme Council in June to discuss the war in general, policy, they said Soviet entry would determine the fate of the empire. Kawabe Toroshiro said, "The absolute maintenance of peace in our relations with the Soviet Union is one of the fundamental conditions for continuing the war."

Japan’s leaders said Hiroshima forced them to surrender because it made a terrific explanation for losing the war. But the facts show that Hiroshima did not force Japan to surrender.

If nuclear weapons are a religion, Hiroshima is the first miracle. What do we make of a religion when its miracles turn out to be false? Nuclear weapons shocked Japan into surrendering in World War II—except they didn’t.

Transcript of the entire lecture

This talk was based on a discussion of Five Myths About Nuclear Weapons.

核伦理与军事化资源

2021 年 12 月 15 日 - 播客

军事化对 2022 年及以后的安全至关重要吗?

2022 年 7 月 28 日 - 播客

The Doorstep:加里-萨莫尔博士:核战争的真正威胁是什么?

布兰代斯大学教授加里-萨莫尔(Gary Samore)与 "门口 "节目联合主持人尼克-格沃斯蒂夫(Nick Gvosdev)和塔蒂亚娜-塞拉芬(Tatiana Serafin)一起讨论核威慑如何促进克制和谨慎,以及希望...

2021 年 9 月 9 日 - 播客

9/11 事件二十年:灰色战争、美国价值观与国家安全的未来

在 9/11 袭击发生后的 20 年里,国家安全决策考验着美国的民主价值观。本小组由Carnegie Council 主席乔尔-罗森塔尔(Joel Rosenthal)主持。

纳米级材料与现行军备控制制度

Carnegie Council 继续出版以新兴技术与国际冲突的交叉点为重点的资源。

决策者如何在战争中使用纳米材料方面做出负责任的选择?

收听播客